The nine flags
These BPC-157 flags are in no particular order. One near the bottom isn't weaker than one near the top.
Each is settled by a question about a document, not a feeling about a brand. We don't name any seller on this page.
The page has an incentive and does not say so
Any page telling you where to buy gains from where you go, ours included. Honest pages say so in writing.
An unstated incentive doesn't make the paperwork wrong. It just tells you to read it twice.
Does the page say in writing what it stands to gain?A purity figure with nothing beside it
A number alone only says a lab was involved. A real measurement carries its method and the pass mark it was judged against. Without both, a percentage is decoration.
Does the figure name its method, and is a release criterion printed next to it?A badge that no file stands behind
"Lab tested" next to a shield graphic is the cheapest thing on any listing. The proof is the file, not the badge. A badge that clicks through to nothing is a claim dressed up as evidence.
Does the badge open a certificate, or does it open nothing at all?A picture of a certificate, not a certificate
An image only shows what sat in the frame, cropped to flatter. A document has pages, a certificate number, a batch code, a lab name and a date. That's the difference between a claim and a record.
Are there pages, a number, a batch code and a laboratory name, or just an image?A certificate that names no laboratory
A panel that won't say who ran it proves nothing about who ran it. The name has to be on the document. A lab named only in the marketing text around the file is a name attached to nothing.
Is a laboratory named on the file, or only in the sentences around it?A panel missing the sterility or the endotoxin line
Purity answers one question. Sterility and bacterial endotoxin answer others, and on a full panel they sit together on one line.
A page that shows purity and goes quiet on those two is showing you part of the panel and calling it the whole.
Are sterility and bacterial endotoxin both present, or is one of them missing?No route from the vial back to the paper
A certificate proves something about a batch. It proves nothing about your vial unless a published route connects the two.
A listing that shows a document but can't say how your vial ties back to it has skipped the step that gives the document meaning. More at the vial to paper route.
Is there a published way to connect a delivered unit to the certificate shown?A best place claim with no paper behind it
"Best place to buy" is a marketing line, not a finding. A verdict with no document under it is just ranking itself. A page worth reading points to paper anyone can open.
Does the page cite a document you can open, or does it only rank itself?A certificate held behind your email
The certificate is the one thing on a listing that should open freely. If it's held back until you hand over an email, the form was put there on purpose, and rarely for your benefit.
Does the file open without a form, or does the form come before the file?What settles most of these?
Seven of the nine come down to one move: open the seller's published certificate and count what's on it. The ten line version is the request that settles most of these.
Then go back to the audit table to see which counters can produce the document at all. The supplier we link publishes its BPC-157 certificate on the supplier's BPC-157 page.
Scope and research reading
We report two things only: what a seller publishes for anyone to open without an email, and what one supplier's certificate for this compound records.
Material like this is sold for lab research, and it isn't an approved medicine. We don't say what the compound does or weigh a purchase against anyone's situation. A question about a person belongs with a licensed clinician.